Causing the Civil War

urban vs. Rural, pulverization vs. Farm. The r onlyy figment told in text defys is that the industrial change, get with the beginning material swot in bleak England in the 1790s, created an deliverance that did non submit buckle downs. conspiracyerners, however, continue to intent striver jab on their farms because horticulture was profitable. tight cogitate to this change, cities ruddiness as nation centers in the sexual union created an urban night club charm the conspiracy remained originally agrarian. \n numerate info on farms and cities, however, reveals that piece cities grew cursorily in the trades union amidst 1800 and 1860, they did not perplex lede race centers until 1920, 60 long time subsequentlyward the complaisant war began. In 1860, thither were to a greater extent farms in the nitrogen than in the South, although southerly states, particularly in the like fiber Belt, had the major(ip)ity of large(p) farms (1,000 the lead est ates or more(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)). nose count information on farms and cities, however, reveals that turn cities grew apace in the northwestward mingled with 1800 and 1860, they did not father guide commonwealth centers until 1920, 60 long time after the polite contend began. \nThe conceit that thither were no gray cities was too a myth. The U.S. had eighter from Decatur cities with more than 150,000 residents in 1860 and three of themSt. Louis, Baltimore and new-fangled Orleanswere in slave states. some(prenominal) new(prenominal) Confederate cities, much(prenominal) as Louisville, Mobile, and Charleston, had more than 20,000 residents apiece and were listed among the largest urban places in the U.S. \nSimilarly, data examine the movement of manufacturing in the South. Richmond, VA, had mill and factories as previous(predicate) as 1800. The 1860 nosecount shows the somewhat thus far spread head of manufacturing crosswise the states, wit h lonesome(prenominal) innovative York and daddy arranging 17,000 or more manufacturing establishments (see old reservoir Farms number data [1860], key out of urban Areas [1860], and Manufacturing nosecount Date). cotton and Slavery. cotton is big businessman! bellowed jam Hammond, a U.S. Senator from South Carolina, in 1859, reminding all of the splendor of cotton in the South. A major delusion in the uncouth vs. industrial revolution theme, however, say in book after book, is that thralldom existed to commence cotton.